TREATMENT OUTCOMES OF THE ALVEOLAR RIDGE REGRESSIVE TRANSFORMATION USING AUTOLOGOUS ADIPOSE-TISSUE DERIVED STROMAL VASCULAR FRACTION

Aim. The study was performed in order to assess the size, structure and chewing ability of the maxillary ridge reconstructed using autologous adipose-tissue derived stromal vascular fraction (ATD SVF) in a long-term study (10 years).

Materials and methods. The study involved 141 patients (61 men, 80 women) aged from 45 to 78 years (mean age 57 years) with a regression transformation of the alveolar ridge of the upper and lower jaw. In the test group (TG), 112 osteoplastic surgeries were performed using autologous adipose-tissue derived stromal vascular fraction (ATD SVF) followed by the installation of 297 dental implants into the reconstructed ridge to restore the chewing function. The control group (CG) comprised 117 surgeries performed according to generally accepted methods followed by the installation of 323 artifi cial supports. The size of the alveolar ridge and the support function of the reconstructed bone were evaluated during the period of up to 10 years. In the histological and histomorphometric study, 27 trephine biopsy specimens of reconstructed bone obtained during dental implantation were studied. The resulting digital material was processed by conventional methods of variation statistics.

Results. The results of a comparative study have confi rmed the advantages of the proposed approach with the use of ATD SVF over current generally accepted methods for the reconstruction of the jaw alveolar ridge. The use of ATD SVF in the composition of osteoplastic material allows the required degree of augmentation of the atrophied bone area to be achieved with a minimal risk of complications and reoperations (8% and 21% of cases in TG and CG, respectively, p = 0.231), along with the optimal morphological characteristics of the regenerate (40.14 ± 3.36 and 24.23 ± 2.63 percent of viable mineralized bone tissue on sections of trephine biopsy specimens from TG and KG, p = 0.001). These results ensure reliable osseointegration of artifi cial supports in the reconstructed alveolar ridge and a high effi ciency of orthopedic treatment with implant supports during the period of up to 10 years (97% and 88% in TG and CG, respectively, r˂0.001).

Conclusion. The proposed innovative approach can be recommended as a basis for a surgical protocol with a pronounced regression transformation of the jaw alveolar ridge. This will allow the chewing function to be restored more successfully and predictably with the use of artifi cial supports in the reconstructed bone in this category of patients. 

1. Esposito M., Worthington H. V., Thomsen P., Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (3): CD003878. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub2

2. Deev R. V., Drobyshev A.Yu., Bozo I.Ya. Ordinarnye I aktivirovannye osteoplasticheskie materialy. Vestnik travmatologii I ortopedii N. N. Priorova. 2015; 1: 51–65 (In Russ., English abstract).

3. Khojasteh A., Morad G., Behnia H. Clinical importance of recipient site characteristics for vertical ridge augmentation: A systematic review of literature and proposal of a classifi cation. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 39(3): 386–98. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00210

4. Felice P., Pistilli R., Lizio G., Pellegrino G., Nisii A., Marchetti C. Inlay versus onlay iliac bone grafting in atrophic posterior mandible: a prospective controlled clinical trial for the comparison of two techniques. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2009; 11 (Suppl 1): е69–82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00212.x

5. Perova M. D., Kozlov V. A., Mel’nik E. A., Karpyuk V. B., Sarkisov A.Ya. New scopes of the osseous defects replacement following processed lipoaspirate cells autografting in the cure the great odontogenic cysts. Institut Stomatologii. 2011; 1(50): 107–109 (In Russ., English abstract).

6. Calori G. M., Mazza E., Colombo M., Ripamonti C. The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specifi c needs? Injury. 2011; 42 (Suppl 2): S56–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.011

7. Karpyuk V. B., Perova M. D., Shubich M. G. K izucheniyu svezhevydelennyh autologichnyh stromal’nyh kletok podkozhnoj zhirovoj kletchatki dlya regeneracii biologicheskih tkanej. Institut Stomatologii. 2009; 3(44): 74–76 (In Russ., English abstract).

8. Karpyuk V. B., Lavreshin P. M., Shubich M. G., Ponkina O. N., Pavlyuk K. S., Berezhnoi D. V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the application of the stromal vascular fraction cells in contour plastic surgery of the facial soft tissues (exemplifi ed by an MRI study of lip augmentation by lipofi lling). Annaly Plasticheskoi, Rekonstruktivnoi i Esteticheskoi Khirurgii. 2014; 3: 57–63 (In Russ., English abstract).

9. Dominici M., Le Blanc K., Mueller I., Slaper-Cortenbach I., Marini F., Krause D., Deans R., Keating A., Prockop Dj., Horwitz E. Minimal criteria for defi ning multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006; 8(4): 315–317. DOI: 10.1080/14653240600855905

10. Mildmay-White A., Khan W. Cell surface markers on adipose-derived stem cells: a systematic review. Curr. Stem. Cell Res. Ther. 2017; 12(6): 484–492. DOI: 10.2174/1574888X11666160429122133

11. Nary Filho H., Pinto T. F., de Freitas C. P., Ribeiro-Junior P. D., dos Santos P. L., Matsumoto M. A. Autogenous bone grafts contamination after exposure to the oral cavity. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2014; 25(2): 412–414. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000682

12. Gupta N., Krasnodembskaya A., Kapetanaki M., Mouded M., Tan X., Serikov V., Matthay M. A. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance survival and bacterial clearance in murine Escherichia coli pneumonia. Thorax. 2012; 67(6): 533–539. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201176

13. Mezey E., Nemeth K. Mesenchymalstem cells and infectious diseases: Smarter than drugs. Immunol. Lett. 2015; 168(2): 208–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2015.05.020

14. Sung D. K., Chang Y. S., Sung S. I., Yoo H. S., Ahn S. Y., Park W. S. Antibacterial effect of mesenchymalstem cells against Escherichia coli is mediated by secretion of beta- defensin-2 via toll-like receptor 4 signalling. Cell. Microbiol. 2016; 18(3): 424–436. DOI: 10.1111/cmi.12522

15. Badylak S. F., Valentin J. E., Ravindra A. K., McCabe G. P., Stewart-Akers A. M. Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2008; 14(11): 1835–1842. DOI: 10.1089/ten. tea.2007.0264

16. Dong Z., Peng Z., Chang Q., Lu F. The survival condition and immunoregulatory function of adipose stromal vascular fraction (SVF) in the early stage of nonvascularized adipose transplantation. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11): e80364.

17. Bowles A. C., Wise R. M., Gerstein B. Y. et al. Immunomodulatory effects of adipose stromal vascular fractioncells promote alternative activation macrophages to repair tissue damage. Stem. Cells. 2017; 35(10): 2198–2207. DOI: 10.1002/stem.2689

18. Parfenova E. V., Tkachuk V. A., Kalinina N. I., Traktuev D. O., Ratner E. I., Talitskii K. A., March K. L., Dzhonston B., Rakhmat-Zade T. M., Tsokolaeva Z. I. Poisk novykh «instrumentov» dlya terapevticheskogo angiogeneza. Molekulyarnaya Meditsina. 2006; 2: 10–23 (in Russ.).

19. Koh Y. J., Koh B. I., Kim H., Joo H. J., Jin H. K., Jeon J., Choi C., Lee D. H., Chung J. H., Cho C. H., Park W. S., Ryu J. K., Suh J. K., Koh G. Y. Stromal vascular fraction from adipose tissue forms profound vascular network through the dynamic reassembly of blood endothelial cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011; 31(5): 1141–1150. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.218206

20. Zakhari J. S., Zabonick J., Gettler B., Williams S. K. Vasculogenic and angiogenic potential of adipose stromal vascular fraction cell populations in vitro. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2018; 54 (1): 32–40. DOI: 10.1007/s11626-017-0213-7

21. Zernitskii A.Yu., Medvedeva E.Yu. Role of soft tissue around dental implants in the development of peri-implantitis. Institut Stomatologii. 2012; 1 (54): 80–81 (In Russ., English abstract).

22. Bassetti R. G., Stahli A., Bassetti M. A., Sculean A. Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Investig. 2016; 20 (7): 1369–1387. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1815-2

23. Lin G. H., Chan H. L., Wang H. L. The signifi cance of kera tinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J. Periodontol. 2013; 84 (12): 1755–1767. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2013.120688

24. Gjerde С., Mustafa K., Hellem S., Rojewski M., Gjengedal H., Yassin M. A., Feng X., Skaale S., Berge T., Rosen A., Shi X. Q., Ahmed A. B., Gjertsen B. T., Schrezenmeier H., Layrolle P. Cell therapy induced regeneration of severely atrophied mandibular bone in a clinical trial. Stem. Cell. Res. Ther. 2018; 9 (1): 213. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-0951-9

25. Osugi M., Katagiri W., Yoshimi R., Inukai T., Hibi H., Ueda M. Conditioned media from mesenchymal stem cells enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial bone defects. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2012; 18 (13–14): 1479– 1489. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0325

26. Hirose Y., Funahashi Y., Matsukawa Y. et al. Comparison of trophic factors secreted from human adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction with those from adipose-derived stromal/stem cells in the same individuals. Cytotherapy. 2018; 20(4): 589–591. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.02.001