Scoring Models For The Severity Of Combined Craniofacial Trauma (A Review)
https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2020-27-5-144-162
Abstract
Background. Severe combined trauma is a pressing issue in modern medicine. Victims with a severe combined trauma receive constant monitoring for the severity of their condition. There is no commonly adopted uniform model for assessing the severity of injuries.
Objectives. To review existing scoring methods for assessing the severity of combined craniofacial trauma.
Мethods. A search of Russian and foreign publications in the PubMed and Elibrary databases at the depth of 10 years was conducted. The query terms were: injury severity, trauma severity [тяжесть травм], trauma severity score [шкалы оценки тяжести травм], cranio-facial trauma severity [тяжесть черепно-лицевой травмы]. The record selection was based on its scientifi c value in this research topic.
Results. This systematic review covered 49 scientifi c papers reporting methods for assessing the severity of combined craniofacial trauma. Depending on the main applied principle, the severity scoring methods were classifi ed into 3 groups: anatomical, physiological and combined. Along with the history of creation, main advantages and disadvantages of the methods in terms of scoring performance in combined craniofacial trauma were outlined. Severity scoring models in isolated maxillofacial trauma were described in detail.
Conclusion. There is no generally accepted best clinical practice for trauma severity scoring, including craniofacial trauma. The majority of scoring models are developed for survival chance estimation. At the same time, dynamic monitoring in hospitals most commonly relies on non-specifi c methods for the general severity estimation in trauma victims.
About the Authors
A. I. N. Nassar
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ameed N. I. Nassar* — Postgraduate Student, Chair of Maxillofacial and Dental Surgery
21 Liniya V.O., 8a, kab. 216., St. Petersburg, 199106
D. Yu. Madai
Saint Petersburg State University
Dmitrii Yu. Madai — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Head of the Chair of Maxillofacial and Dental Surgery
Universitetskaya Embankment, 7-9, St. Petersburg, 199034
References
1. Maday D.Yu., Golovko K.P., Badalov V.I., Maday O.D., Zhirnova N.A., Samokhvalov I.M. Multi-Stage surgical treatment as a means of dicreasing mortality in patients with combined maxillofacial and craniocerebral trauma. Emergency Medical Care. 2016; 17(2): 33– 41 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.24884/2072-6716-2016-17-2-33-41
2. Gumanenko E.K., Scherbuk Yu.A., Silyuk M.G., Golovko K.P., Maday O.D., Udaltsova N.A., et al. Biometric aspects in treatment of combined trauma. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2018; 177(3): 25–30 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-3-25-30
3. Seliverstov P.A., Shapkin Y.G. Assessment of severity and prognosis of polytrauma outcome: the current state of the problem (review). Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine. 2017; 9(2): 207–218 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.17691/stm2017.9.2.25
4. Gangloff A. Safety in accidents: hugh dehaven and the development of crash injury studies. Technology and Culture. 2013; 54: 40–61. DOI: 10.1353/tech.2013.0029
5. Loftis K.L., Price J., Gillich P.J. Evolution of the abbreviated injury scale: 1990–2015. Traffi c. Inj. Prev. 2018; 19(sup2): S109–S113. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1512747
6. Palmer C.S., Gabbe B.J., Cameron P.A. Defi ning major trauma using the 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale. Injury. 2016; 47(1): 109–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.003
7. Kim Y.J. Injury severity scoring systems: a review of application to practice. Nurs. Crit. Care. 2012; 17(3): 138–150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2012.00498.x
8. Rozenfeld M., Radomislensky I., Freedman L., Givon A., Novikov I., Peleg K. ISS groups: are we speaking the same language? Inj. Prev. 2014; 20(5): 330–335. DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-04104
9. Chien D.K., Hwang H.F., Lin M.R. Injury severity measures for predicting return-to-work after a traumatic brain injury. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2017; 98: 101–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.025
10. Galvagno S.M. Jr, Massey M., Bouzat P., Vesselinov R., Levy M.J., Millin M.G., et al. Correlation Between the Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score: Implications for Prehospital Trauma Triage. Prehosp. Emerg. Care. 2019; 23(2): 263–270. DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1489019
11. Deng Q., Tang B., Xue C., Liu Y., Liu X., Lv Y., Zhang L. Comparison of the Ability to Predict Mortality between the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score: A Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 2016; 13(8): 825. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13080825
12. Eid H.O., Abu-Zidan F.M. New Injury Severity Score is a better predictor of mortality for blunt trauma patients than the Injury Severity Score. World J. Surg. 2015; 39(1): 165–171. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2745-2
13. Smith B.P., Goldberg A.J., Gaughan J.P., Seamon M.J. A comparison of Injury Severity Score and New Injury Severity Score after penetrating trauma: A prospective analysis. J. Trauma. Acute. Care. Surg. 2015; 79(2): 269–274. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000753
14. Haas B., Xiong W., Brennan-Barnes M., Gomez D., Nathens A.B. Overcoming barriers to population-based injury research: development and validation of an ICD10-to-AIS algorithm. Can. J. Surg. 2012; 55(1): 21–26. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.017510
15. Hartensuer R., Nikolov B., Franz D., Weimann A., Raschke M., Juhra C. Comparison of ICD 10 and AIS with the Development of a Method for Automated Conversion. Z. Orthop. Unfall. 2015; 153(6): 607–612. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546217
16. Clark D.E., Black A.W., Skavdahl D.H., Hallagan L.D. Open-access programs for injury categorization using ICD-9 or ICD-10. Inj. Epidemiol. 2018; 5(1): 11. DOI: 10.1186/s40621-018-0149-8
17. Claeson A., Sterner M., Attergrim J., Khajanchi M., Kumar V., Saha M.L., Gerdin Wärnberg M. Assessment of the predictive value of the International Classifi cation of Diseases Injury Severity Score for trauma mortality in urban India. J. Surg. Res. 2018; 229: 357–364. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.071
18. Gagné M., Moore L., Sirois M.J., Simard M., Beaudoin C., Kuimi B.L. Performance of International Classifi cation of Diseases-based injury severity measures used to predict in-hospital mortality and intensive care admission among traumatic brain-injured patients. J. Trauma. Acute. Care. Surg. 2017; 82(2): 374–382. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001319
19. Allen C.J., Wagenaar A.E., Horkan D.B., Baldor D.J., Hannay W.M., Tashiro J., et al. Predictors of mortality in pediatric trauma: experiences of a level 1 trauma center and an assessment of the International Classifi cation Injury Severity Score (ICISS). Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2016; 32(7): 657–663. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-016-3900-7
20. Shcherbuk Yu.A., Madai D.Yu., Gavrilin S.V., Shcherbuk A.Yu., Absava K.A., Madai O.D. Methodological aspects of surgical approach in victims with severe multiple craniofacial trauma in consideration of severity of traumatic injury. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2014; 173(3): 49–54 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2014-173-3-49-54
21. Sahni V. Maxillofacial trauma scoring systems. Injury. 2016; 47(7): 1388–1392. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.001
22. Green S.M., Haukoos J.S., Schriger D.L. How to measure the glasgow coma scale. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2017; 70(2): 158–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.12.016
23. de Sousa I., Woodward S. The Glasgow Coma Scale in adults: doing it right. Emerg. Nurse. 2016; 24(8): 33–39. DOI: 10.7748/en.2016.e1638
24. Mehta R., Chinthapalli K. Glasgow coma scale explained. B.M.J. 2019; 365: l1296. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l1296
25. Chou R., Totten A.M., Carney N., Dandy S., Fu R., Grusing S., et al. Predictive Utility of the Total Glasgow Coma Scale Versus the Motor Component of the Glasgow Coma Scale for Identifi cation of Patients With Serious Traumatic Injuries. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2017; 70(2): 143–157.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.032
26. Bledsoe B.E., Casey M.J., Feldman J., Johnson L., Diel S., Forred W., Gorman C. Glasgow Coma Scale Scoring is Often Inaccurate. Prehosp. Disaster. Med. 2015; 30(1): 46–53. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X14001289
27. Yousefzadeh-Chabok S., Kazemnejad-Leili E., Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati L., Hosseinpour M., Ranjbar F., Malekpouri R., Mohtasham-Amiri Z. Comparing Pediatric Trauma, Glasgow Coma Scale and Injury Severity scores for mortality prediction in traumatic children. Ulus. Travma. Acil. Cerrahi. Derg. 2016; 22(4): 328– 332. DOI: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.83930
28. Nik A., Sheikh Andalibi M.S., Ehsaei M.R., Zarifi an A., Ghayoor Karimiani E., Bahadoorkhan G. The Effi cacy of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II for Predicting Hospital Mortality of ICU Patients with Acute Traumatic Brain Injury. Bull. Emerg. Trauma. 2018; 6(2): 141–145. DOI: 10.29252/beat-060208
29. Sepahvand E., Jalali R., Mirzaei M., Ebrahimzadeh F., Ahmadi M., Amraii E. Glasgow Coma Scale Versus Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Scale for Prediction of Outcomes in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury in the Intensive Care Unit. Turk. Neurosurg. 2016; 26(5): 720–724. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.13536-14.0
30. Alvarez B.D., Razente D.M., Lacerda D.A., Lother N.S., VON-Bahten L.C., Stahlschmidt C.M. Analysis of the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) in 200 victims of different trauma mechanisms. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2016; 43(5): 334–340. DOI: 10.15900100-69912016005010
31. Domingues Cde A., Nogueira Lde S. Settervall C.H., Sousa R.M. Performance of Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments: an integrative review. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2015; 49: 138–146. DOI: 10.1590/S0080-623420150000700020
32. Tito A., Saragih S.G.R., Natalia D. Comparison of Revised Trauma Score Based on Intracranial Haemorrhage Volume among Head Injury Patients. Prague. Med. Rep. 2018; 119(1): 52–60. DOI: 10.14712/23362936.2018.5
33. Jeong J.H., Park Y.J., Kim D.H., Kim T.Y., Kang C., Lee S.H., et al. The new trauma score (NTS): a modifi cation of the revised trauma score for better trauma mortality prediction. B.M.C. Surg. 2017; 17(1): 77. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-017-0272-4.
34. Hosseini M., Ramazani J. Evaluation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scoring systems for prognostication of outcomes among Intensive Care Unit’s patients. Saudi. J. Anaesth. 2016; 10(2): 168–173. DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.168817
35. Venkataraman R., Gopichandran V., Ranganathan L., Rajagopal S., Abraham B.K., Ramakrishnan N. Mortality Prediction Using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV Scoring Systems: Is There a Difference? Indian. J. Crit. Care. Med. 2018; 22(5): 332–335. DOI: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_422_17
36. Varghese Y.E., Kalaiselvan M.S., Renuka M.K., Arunkumar A.S. Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation IV (APACHE IV) severity of illness scoring systems, in a multidisciplinary ICU. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017; 33(2): 248–253. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.209741
37. Trancă S., Petrișor C., Hagău N., Ciuce C. Can APACHE II, SOFA, ISS, and RTS Severity Scores be used to Predict Septic Complications in Multiple Trauma Patients? J. Crit. Care. Med. (Targu Mures). 2016; 2(3): 124–130. DOI: 10.1515/jccm-2016-0019
38. Korkmaz Toker M., Gülleroğlu A., Karabay A.G., Biçer İ.G., Demiraran Y. SAPS III or APACHE IV: Which score to choose for acute trauma patients in intensive care unit? Ulus. Travma. Acil. Cerrahi. Derg. 2019; 25(3): 247–252. DOI: 10.5505/tjtes.2018.22866
39. Agarwal A., Agrawal A., Maheshwari R. Evaluation of Probability of Survival using APACHE II & TRISS Method in Orthopaedic Polytrauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Centre. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2015; 9(7): RC01–4. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12355.6201
40. Semenov A.V., Semenova Yu.A. The survival prognosis of the multiple trauma, combined with brain injury. Emergency Medical Care. 2016; 17(4): 26–32 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.24884/2072-6716-2016-17-4-26-32
41. de Munter L., Polinder S., Nieboer D., Lansink K.W.W., Steyerberg E.W., de Jongh M.A.C. Performance of the modifi ed TRISS for evaluating trauma care in subpopulations: A cohort study. Injury. 2018; 49(9): 1648– 1653. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.036
42. Domingues C.A., Coimbra R., Poggetti R.S., Nogueira L.S., de Sousa R.M.C. New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2018; 13: 12. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0171-8
43. Lam S.W., Lingsma H.F., van Beeck E.F., Leenen L.P. Validation of a base defi cit-based trauma prediction model and comparison with TRISS and ASCOT. Eur. J. Trauma. Emerg. Surg. 2016; 42(5): 627–633. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-015-0592-y
44. Yousefzadeh-Chabok S., Hosseinpour M., Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati L., Ranjbar F., Malekpouri R., Razzaghi A., Mohtasham-Amiri Z. Comparison of Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score for mortality prediction in elderly trauma patients. Ulus. Travma. Acil. Cerrahi. Derg. 2016; 22(6): 536–540. DOI: 10.5505/tjtes.2016.93288
45. Barea-Mendoza J.A., Chico-Fernández M., Sánchez-Casado M., Molina-Díaz I., Quintana-Díaz M., Jiménez-Moragas J.M., et al.; en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de Neurointensivismo y Trauma de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias. Predicting survival in geriatric trauma patients: A comparison between the TRISS methodology and the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score. Cir. Esp. 2018; 96(6): 357–362. DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.02.014
46. Valderrama-Molina C.O., Giraldo N., Constain A., Puerta A., Restrepo C., León A., Jaimes F. Validation of trauma scales: ISS, NISS, RTS and TRISS for predicting mortality in a Colombian population. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2017; 27(2): 213–220. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-016-1892-6
47. Bouzat P., Legrand R., Gillois P., Ageron F.X., Brun J., Savary D., et al.; TRENAU Group. Prediction of intra-hospital mortality after severe trauma: which pre-hospital score is the most accurate? Injury. 2016; 47(1): 14–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.035
48. Rapsang A.G., Shyam D.C. Scoring systems of severity in patients with multiple trauma. Cir. Esp. 2015; 93(4): 213–221. DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.12.021
49. Chen C., Zhang Y., An J.G., He Y., Gong X. Comparative study of four maxillofacial trauma scoring systems and expert score. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2014; 72(11): 2212–2220. DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.035
Review
For citations:
Nassar A.I., Madai D.Yu. Scoring Models For The Severity Of Combined Craniofacial Trauma (A Review). Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2020;27(5):144-162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2020-27-5-144-162
Views:
573
Email this article 