Postoperative observations in genital prolapse surgery

Background. Pelvic prolapse is a common reason of gynaecological visits. Predispositions of genital prolapse comprise oestrogen deficiency, vaginal labour, congenital connective tissue dysplasia, etc. Specific approaches and treatments for genital prolapse are priority developments in gynaecological surgery.

Objectives. Assessment of the safety and efficacy of variant techniques for pelvic prolapse surgical correction depending on its type and clinical manifestations.

Methods. A total of 188 women were examined and treated surgically. The patients were divided in three cohorts by type of prolapse. Cohort 1 contained 108 patients with a pronounced defect of pubocervical fascia having mesh implants; cohort 2 — 65 patients without pronounced fascial defect having urethral slings and native-tissue corrections; cohort 3 — 15 prolapse patients having sacrovaginopexy for longer reproductive health.

Results. Two complications were observed: 1000-mL blood loss requiring internal iliac arteries ligation and haemotransfusion; 300-mL blood loss with pelvic haematoma opening and drainage. Postoperative period without peculiarities in all cohorts. Two patients developed vaginal mucosal erosion up to 1 cm in one month. One-year clinical monitoring in all cohorts showed an improvement in functional and anatomical outcomes.

Conclusion. Genital prolapse requires a personalised approach, which contributes to patient compliance and reduces postoperative complications and recurrences. Mesh implants improve surgical outcomes in patients with severe defects of pubocervical fascia, and urethral slings are effective in urinary incontinence.

1. Popov A.A., Atroshenko K.V., Slobodyanyuk B.A., Fedorov A.A., Manannikova T.N., Tyurina S.S., Koval A.A., Barto R.A., Golovin A.A. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of patients with genital prolapse. Rossiiskii Vestnik Akushera-Ginekologa. 2016; 16(2): 65-69 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.17116/rosakush201616265-69

2. Gaivoronsky I.V.1, Niauri D.A., Bessonov N.Yu., Nichi-poruk N.G., Shkarupa D.D., Kovalev G.V. Morphological features of the small pelvis structure, as prerequisites for developing genital prolapse. Kurskii Nauchno-Prakticheskii Vestnik “Chelovek i Ego Zdorov’e”. 2018; (2): 86-93 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.21626/vestnik/2018-2/14

3. Apresyan S.V., Dimitrova V.I., Slyusareva O.A. Prevention of complications of estrogen-dependent complications in preoperative preparation of women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Medical Council. 2016; (2): 96-99 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2016-2-96-99

4. Frigerio M., Mastrolia S.A., Spelzini F., Manodoro S., Yohay D., Weintraub A.Y. Long-term effects of episiotomy on urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2019; 299(2): 317-325. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-5009-9

5. Gazibara T., Rancic B., Radovanovic S., Kurtagic I., Nurkovic S., Kovacevic N., Dotlic J. Climacteric women at work: What lurks behind poor occupational quality of life? Health. Care. Women. Int. 2018; 39(12): 1350-1365. DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1464573

6. Vergeldt T.F.M., Notten K.J.B., Kluivers K.B., Weemhoff M. Recurrence risk is associated with preopera-tively advanced prolapse stage: Is there a difference between women with stage 2 and those with stage 3 or 4 cystocele? Int. Urogynecol. J. 2017; 28(7): 983987. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3216-0

7. Bradley M.S., Askew A.L., Vaughan M.H., Kawasaki A., Visco A.G. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 218(5): 514.e1-514.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.046

8. Huemer H. Deszensus genitalis der Frau [Pelvic Organ Prolapse]. Ther. Umsch. 2019; 73(9): 553-558. German. DOI: 10.1024/0040-5930/a001037

9. Barinova E.K., Ordiyants E.G., Aryutin D.G., Ordiyants I.M., Dobrovolskaya D.A. Prolapse genitals: look at the problem. Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training. 2020; 8(3(29)): 128-131 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.24411/2303-9698-202013021

10. Fomenko O.Yu., Shelygin Yu.A., Popov A.A., Kozlov V.A., Fedorov A.A., Belousova S.V., Efremova E.S. Rectal evacuatory dysfunction in patients with genital prolapse. Rossiiskii Vestnik Akushera-Ginekologa. 2018; 18(5): 67-72 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.17116/rosakush20181805167

11. Barinova E.K., Damirova S.F., Aryutin D.G., Ordiyants I.M., Gagaev C.G., Zulumyan T.N., Ordiyants E.G. A differential approach to treating apical prolapse via a vaginal route. Akusherstvoi Ginekologiya. 2020; (6): 124-131 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI:10.18565/aig.2020.6.124-131

12. Costantini E., Lazzeri M. What part does mesh play in urogenital prolapse management today? Curr. Opin. Urol. 2015; 25(4): 300-304. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000177

13. Oliver J.L., Tarnay Ch.M. Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy with Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy. In: The Use of Robotic Technology in Female Pelvic Floor Reconstruction. Anger J.T., Eilber K.S. editors. Springer International Publishing AG; Cham: 2018. 73-89. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59611-2_7

14. Lee R.K., Mottrie A., Payne C.K., Waltregny D. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Eur. Urol. 2014; 65(6): 1128-1137. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.064