Rett syndrome: a clinical case
https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2021-28-1-116-124
Abstract
Background. Rett syndrome is a rare genetic disorder often mimicked by variant other illnesses, which hampers its timely diagnosis. Although knowledge of this pathology has grown remarkably over the past two decades, an appropriate diagnosis is necessary to exclude similar disease phenotypes and select an applicable therapy.
Clinical Case Description. A 3-yo girl was admitted with a loss of earlier motor skills. The girl had neurological monitoring since month 2 of age for a delayed psychomotor development and had courses of neurotropic and reconstructive therapy, ineffective. At 18 months she was diagnosed with infantile cerebral palsy, residual period, atonic-astatic form, grade 3, rehabilitation therapy ineffective. With the disease progression and loss of motor skills, the girl was referred to the Bochkov Research Centre for Medical Genetics for sequence genotyping of the MECP2 gene, which determined a heterozygous single-nucleotide polymorphism c.468C>G (p.D156E) diagnostic of the Rett syndrome. The Rett syndrome has poor prognosis for progressive motor and neurological deficiency and eventual severe mental retardation. Patients with the Rett syndrome can have life expectancy of up to 40—50 years with appropriate care but incur a high risk of sudden death.
Conclusion. The Rett syndrome is a rare disorder manifested by loss of earlier developed motor and speech skills. This report provides a clear case description and illustrates the difficulty of the syndrome timely diagnosis aggravated by a lack of specific paraclinical signatures. Molecular genotyping techniques allow a proper diagnosis and prognosis assessment in this pathology.
About the Authors
A. V. BurlutskayaRussian Federation
Alla V. Burlutskaya — Head of the Chair of Paediatrics No. 2.
Mitrofana Sedina str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063
A. S. Ivanenko
Russian Federation
Alina S. Ivanenko — graduate student (6 year), Faculty of Paediatrics.
Mitrofana Sedina str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063
A. V. Statova
Russian Federation
Ananstasia V. Statova — Assoc. Prof., Chair of Pediatrics No. 2.
KIM str. 147-4, Krasnodar, 350063, Russia; tel.: +7 (918) 172-53-46
References
1. Percy A.K. Progress in Rett Syndrome: from discovery to clinical trials. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2016; 166(1112): 325-332. DOI: 10.1007/s10354-016-0491-9
2. Vorsanova S.G., Yurov Yu.B., Voinova V.Yu., Yurov I.Yu. Rett syndrome in russia and abroad: a scientific historical review. Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics.2020; 65: (3): 25-31 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.21508/1027-4065-2020-65-3-25-31
3. Voinova V.Yu., Vorsanova S.G., Yurov Yu.B., Yurov I.Yu. An algorithm for the diagnosis of X-linked intellectual disability in children. Ros. Vestn. Perinatol. I Pediatr. 2016; 61(5): 34-41 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.21508/1027-4065-2016-61-5-34-41
4. Gold W.A., Krishnarajy R., Ellaway C., Christodoulou J. Rett Syndrome: A Genetic Update and Clinical Review Focusing on Comorbidities. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2018; 9(2): 167-176. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00346
5. Leonard H., Cobb S., Downs J. Clinical and biological progress over 50 years in Rett syndrome. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017; 13(1): 37-51. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.186
6. Fehr S., Downs J., Ho G., de Klerk N., Forbes D., Christodoulou J., Williams S., Leonard H. Functional abilities in children and adults with the CDKL5 disorder. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2016; 170(11): 2860-2869. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37851
7. Lyst M.J., Bird A. Rett syndrome: a complex disorder with simple roots. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015; 16(5): 261275. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3897
8. Qiu Z. Deciphering MECP2-associated disorders: disrupted circuits and the hope for repair. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2018; 48: 30-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2017.09.004
9. Lopes F., Barbosa M., Ameur A., Soares G., de Sa J., Dias A.I., Oliveira G., Cabral P., Temudo T., Calado E., Cruz I.F., Vieira J.P., Oliveira R., Esteves S., Sauer S., Jonasson I., Syvanen A.C., Gyllensten U., Pinto D., Maciel P. Identification of novel genetic causes of Rett syndrome-like phenotypes. J. Med. Genet. 2016; 53(3): 190-199. DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103568
10. Malinina E.V., Zabozlaeva I.V. Rett syndrome: difficulties of diagnostics (clinical and psychopathological aspects). Russian Journal of Child Neurology. 2016; 11(3): 49-56 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.17650/2073-8803-2016-11-3-49-56
11. Fonzo M., Sirico F., Corrado B. Evidence-Based Physical Therapy for Individuals with Rett Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Brain. Sci. 2020; 10(7): 410. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10070410
12. Gogliotti R.G., Niswender C.M. A Coordinated Attack: Rett Syndrome Therapeutic Development. Trends. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019; 40(4): 233-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.02.007
13. Sajan S.A., Jhangiani S.N., Muzny D.M., Gibbs R.A., Lupski J.R., Glaze D.G., Kaufmann W.E., Skinner S.A., Annese F., Friez M.J., Lane J., Percy A.K., Neul J.L. Enrichment of mutations in chromatin regulators in people with Rett syndrome lacking mutations in MECP2. Genet. Med. 2017; 19(1): 13-19. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.42
14. Townend G.S., Ehrhart F., van Kranen H.J., Wilkinson M., Jacobsen A., Roos M., Willighagen E.L., van Enckevort D., Evelo C.T., Curfs L.M.G.. MECP2 variation in Rett syndrome-An overview of current coverage of genetic and phenotype data within existing databases. Hum. Mutat. 2018; 39(7): 914-924. DOI: 10.1002/humu.23542
15. Ehrhart F., Sangani N.B., Curfs L.M.G. Current developments in the genetics of Rett and Rett-like syndrome. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry. 2018;31(2):103-108. DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000389
Review
For citations:
Burlutskaya A.V., Ivanenko A.S., Statova A.V. Rett syndrome: a clinical case. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2021;28(1):116-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2021-28-1-116-124