Forensic evaluation of cervical spine distortion injuries in non-fatal road traffic accidents: An observational study

Background. The study relevance is substantiated by the growing numbers of road vehicles and cervical spine traumas occurring among all spinal injuries. Currently, there is no common vision of the cervical trauma pathogenesis, diagnostic algorithm or treatment, which stipulates difficulties in the forensic evaluation of soft tissue injuries of the neck, especially combined with the head or spine traumas around neck, as well as certain diseases.
Objectives. A study of the incidence of cervical spine distortion injuries and their clinical and forensic assessment for severity to human health.
Methods. A retrospective selective single-stage trial and analysis of 32 forensic medical reports on road accident and physical injury administrative cases in 2017 (single year) have been conducted. Normally distributed data are presented as mean (M), standard deviation (SD) and percent shares. The significance of inter-share variation was estimated with Student’s t-test.
Results. Cervical spine distortion injuries more frequently associated with traumas to drivers than passengers inside the salon (81.2%), especially in passenger vehicles, with front-seat travellers inflicted most often (60.0%). Cases of independent pathology were very rare. The most common were combinations with soft tissue injuries, combined blunt trauma to the head, torso and limbs, with craniocerebral or maxillofacial trauma. Cervical osteochondrosis was revealed in 18% cases. Primary diagnosis predominantly grounded on complaints and history (67%), with only 12% cases using a comprehensive neurological examination or instrumental methods. The severity was assessed in the context of concomitant injuries. Acute and moderate severity had equal rates of 6.2%, light severity — 37.5%, no damage — 9.3%. Non-qualified remained 39.8% cases due to a lack of full clinical and instrumental examination (66.7%) or the victim’s failure to appear (13.3%); 20% cases were expert-reported as uncertain for trauma circumstances and mechanism.
Conclusion. Further research and systematisation of the data accumulated are necessary. The following clinical and forensic evaluation, as well as statistical analyses will facilitate common diagnostic and severity assessment algorithms to develop for mechanical soft tissue and ligament injuries of the cervical spine.

1. Yarikov A.V., Perlmutter O.A., Fraerman A.P., Boyarshinov A.A., Lavrenyuk A.N., Simonov A.E., Yaksargin A.V., Yaikbaev I.P. Whiplash injury to the cervical spine. MediAl Journal. 2019; 1: 47–53 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.21145/2225-0026-2019-1-47-53

2. Walton D.M., Macdermid J.C., Giorgianni A.A., Mascarenhas J.C., West S.C., Zammit C.A. Risk factors for persistent problems following acute whiplash injury: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J .Orthop. Sports. Phys. Ther. 2013; 43(2): 31–43. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4507

3. Sarrami P., Armstrong E., Naylor J.M., Harris I.A. Factors predicting outcome in whiplash injury: a systematic meta-review of prognostic factors. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2017; 18(1): 9–16. DOI: 10.1007/s10195-016-0431-x

4. Teresiński G. Development of selective criteria for the verification of whiplash-associated disorders. Arch. Med. Sadowej. Kryminol. 2019; 69(4): 164–191 . DOI: 10.5114/amsik.2019.95716

5. Alektoroff K., Papanagiotou P. Schleudertrauma der Halswirbelsäule [Whiplash injury of the cervical spine]. Radiologe. 2021; 61(8): 710–713. German. DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00877-5

6. Kaale B.R., Krakenes J., Albrektsen G., Wester K. Head position and impact direction in whiplash injuries: associations with MRI-verified lesions of ligaments and membranes in the upper cervical spine. J. Neurotrauma. 2005; 22(11): 1294–1302. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1294

7. Pigolkin Yu.I., Dubrovin I.A., Sedykh E.P., Mosoian A.S. The forensic medical evaluation of the injuries to the cervical spine in the driver and the frontseat passenger of a modern motor vehicle after the frontal crash. Sudebno-Meditsinskaya Ekspertisa. 2015; 58(6): 24–27 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.17116/sudmed201558624-27

8. Pigolkin Yu.I., Dubrovin I.A., Mosoian A.S., Bychkov A.A. The forensic medical evaluation of the injuries inflicted inside the passenger compartment of a moving car equipped with the modern personal safety systems. Sudebno-Meditsinskaya Ekspertisa. 2018; 61(1):16–20 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.17116/sudmed20186116-20

9. Tihova K.E., Savello V.E., Manukovsky V.A. The possibilities of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnosis of spinal cord compression in patients with cervical spine injury. emergency medical care. 2017; 18(3): 22–27 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.24884/2072-6716-2017-18-3-22-27

10. Walton D.M., Elliott J.M. An Integrated Model of Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorder. J. Orthop. Sports. Phys. Ther. 2017; 47(7): 462–471. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7455

11. Hallgren R.C., Rowan J.J. Assessment of potential strain injury to rectus capitis posterior minor muscles during whiplash type distortions of the cervical spine. J. Osteopath. Med. 2021; 121(9): 747–753. DOI: 10.1515/jom-2021-0094

12. Favaretto N, Gheller F, Boscolo-Berto R, Tealdo G, Giacomelli L, Rondinelli R, Marioni G. Road traffic whiplash injury in the elderly: Clinical and video-nystagmographic features. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2020; 41(4): 102497. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102497

13. Favaretto N., Lionello M., Boscolo-Berto R., Giacomelli L., Rondinelli R., Marioni G. Video-nystagmographic evidence in more than 700 consecutive cases of road traffic whiplash injury. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2021; 42(3): 102909. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102909

14. Bottari G., Corradi S., Trotta S., Solarino B. Dissection of the V3-V4 due to whiplash injury: description of a non-fatal case. Clin. Ter. 2020; 170(1): e7–e10. DOI: 10.7417/CT.2020.2181

15. Kędzierski M. Technical criteria for assessing the causes of whiplash injuries. Analysis of simulation parameters of road incident and injury risk assessments. Arch. Med. Sadowej. Kryminol. 2019; 69(4): 192–207. DOI: 10.5114/amsik.2019.95725

16. Smotrova E., Morris L., McNally D. Comparison of standard automotive industry injury predictors and actual injury sustained during significant whiplash events. Eur. Spine. J. 2021; 30(10): 3043–3058. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06851-y

17. Lee Y.H., Lee K.M., Auh Q.S. MRI-Based Assessment of Masticatory Muscle Changes in TMD Patients after Whiplash Injury. J. Clin. Med. 2021; 10(7): 1404. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071404

18. Lee Y.H., Lee K.M., Auh Q.S., Hong J.P. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction of the Relationship between Whiplash Injury and Temporomandibular Disorders. Front. Neurol. 2018; 8: 725. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00725

19. Lee Y.H., Lee K.M., Auh Q.S., Hong J.P. Sex-related differences in symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and structural changes in the lateral pterygoid muscle after whiplash injury. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2019; 46(12): 1107–1120. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12845

20. Kasch H., Hjorth T., Svensson P., Nyhuus L., Jensen T.S. Temporomandibular disorders after whiplash injury: a controlled, prospective study. J. Orofac. Pain. 2002; 16(2): 118–128.

21. Pina D., Puente-López E., Ruiz-Hernández J.A., Ruiz-Cabello A.L., Aguerrevere L., Magalhães T. Whiplash-Associated Disorders. Biopsychosocial Profiles of Pain Perception in Forensic Cases of Victims of Motor Vehicle Accidents. Front. Psychol. 2021; 12: 716513. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716513

22. Elliott J.M., Heinrichs B.E., Walton D.M., Parrish T.B., Courtney D.M., Smith A.C., Hunt J., Kwasny M.J., Wasielewski M., Siegmund G.P. Motor vehicle crash reconstruction: Does it relate to the heterogeneity of whiplash recovery? PLoS One. 2019; 14(12): e0225686. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225686

23. Suissa S. Risk factors of poor prognosis after whiplash injury. Pain. Res. Manag. 2003; 8(2): 69–75. DOI: 10.1155/2003/235683