Preview

Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin

Advanced search

Robotic surgery in gynecology

Abstract

The article describes the use of a da Vinci-assisted (DV) gynecological surgery. DV is the biggest technological development of the recent decades. Currently, over 4000 robotic surgical systems in 54 developed countries and 25 robotic surgical systems in Russia have been used successfully. The type of robot-аssisted gynecological interventions is wide: from uterus-sparing surgery to radical hysterectomy.

About the Authors

A. A. Popov
Moscow regional research institute of obstetrics and gynecology
Russian Federation


K. V. Atroshenko
Moscow regional research institute of obstetrics and gynecology
Russian Federation


B. A. Slobodyanuyk
Moscow regional research institute of obstetrics and gynecology
Russian Federation


G. Z. Ashurova
Moscow regional research institute of obstetrics and gynecology
Russian Federation


S. I. Zingan
Moscow regional research institute of obstetrics and gynecology
Russian Federation


References

1. Давыдов М. И., Кузнецов В. В., Нечушкина В. М. Лекции по онкогинекологии. - Москва: «МЕДпресс-информ», 2009. - С. 12.

2. Прудков М. И., Шулутко А. М., Галмзянов Ф. В., Левит А. Л., Ковалевский А. Д., Алферов С. Ю. Основы минимально-инвазивной хирургии. - Екатеринбург: издательство Уральского университета, 2007. - С. 56-60.

3. Федоров А. В., Кригер А. Г., Берелавичус С. В., Ефанов М. Г., Горин Д. С. Робот-ассистированные операции в абдоминальной хирургии // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н. И. Пирогова. - 2010. - № 1. - С. 16-19.

4. Чиссов В. И., Старинский В. В., Петрова Г. В. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2009 году (заболеваемость и смертность). - М.: ФГУ «МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена Минздравсоцразвития России», 2011. - 260 с.

5. Allendorf J. D., Bessler M., Whelan R. L. et al. Postoperative immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma in a murine model // Surg. endosc. - 1997. - Vol. 11. -P. 427-430.

6. Camarillo D. B., Krummel T. M., Salisbury J. K. Jr. Roboticsurgery: past, present, andfuture // Am. j. sung. - 2004. -№ 188. Suppl. - Р. 2-15.

7. Curado M. P., Edwards B., Shin H. R. et al. Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol. IX. Lyon, France: International agency for research on cancer, 2007 (IARC scientific publications no. 160) (Accessed. December 27, 2007).

8. Kim V. B., Chapman W. H., Albrecht R. J. et al. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci // Surg. laparosc. endosc. percutan. tech. - 2002. - Vol. 12. - P. 34-40.

9. Kimberly L. Levinson, Melinda Auer, Pedro F. Escobar. Evolving technologies in robotic surgery for minimally invasive treatment of gynecologic cancers // Expert. review. of medical. devices. - 2013. - Vol. 10. Issue 5. - Р. 603-610.

10. Kristina M. Mori and Nikki L. Neubauer. Minimally Invasive // Surgery in gynecologic oncology. - 2013. - Р. 11.

11. Kwoh Y. S., Hou J., Jonckheere E. A. et al. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery // IEEE trans. biomed. eng. - 1988. - Vol. 35. -P. 153-161.

12. Meeks G. R. Advanced laparoscopic gynecologic surgery // Surg. clin. north. arm. - 2000. - Vol. 80. - P. 1443-1464.

13. Nichols D. H. Gynecologic and obstetric surgery. - Mosby, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 1993. - Р. 1167-1182.

14. Satava R. M. Robotic surgery: from past to future - a personal journey // Surg. clin. north. arm. - 2003. - Vol. 83. -P. 1491-1500.

15. Satava R. M. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective // Surg. laparosc. endosc. percutan. tech. - 2002. - Vol. 12. - P. 6-16.

16. Stylopoulos N., Rattner D. Robotics and ergonomics // Surg. clin. north. arm. - 2003. - Vol. 83. - P. 1321-1337.

17. Subramaniam А., Kim K. H., Bryant S. A. et al. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma // Gynecologic oncology. - 2011. - Vol. 122. № 3. - Р. 604-607.

18. Wu J. M., Wechter M. E., Geller E. J. et al. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003 // Obstet. gynecol. - 2007. -№ 110. - Р. 1091-1095.


Review

For citations:


Popov A.A., Atroshenko K.V., Slobodyanuyk B.A., Ashurova G.Z., Zingan S.I. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2016;(1):116-120. (In Russ.)

Views: 263


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1608-6228 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9544 (Online)