THE ROLE OF LAPAROTOMIC WOUND INFECTION IN THE FORMATION OF PLANE VISCERAL AND PARIETAL ADHESIONS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ABDOMINAL ADHESIVE DISEASE IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PERITONITIS
https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2019-26-1-67-76
Abstract
The aim is to identify the connection between the presence of peritoneum adhesions and the laparotomic wound healing, as well as to find a way to prevent the adhesive disease.
Materials and methods. The treatment of 149 patients with purulent peritonitis in the main and control groups was performed. In the main group, the laparotomic wounds were sutured by removable draining muscular aponeurotic sutures. In the control group, the laparotomic wounds were sutured with monofilament interrupted sutures in layers, with the edges of the dissected peritoneum being seized into the aponeurotic suture.
Results. The suppurations of laparotomic wounds in the control group were 34.7%. In the main group, where the laparotomic wounds were sutured with removable draining muscular aponeurotic sutures (RDMAS), the suppuration occurred only in one patient (2.2%). The abdominal adhesive disease was observed in 19.4% cases in the control group, with 4 patients (2.0%) having been operated. In the main group, only 2 cases (4.3%) of the abdominal adhesive disease treated without surgical intervention were detected.
Conclusion. One of the main causes of the postoperative abdominal adhesive disease with advanced peritonitis is the suppuration of the laparotomic wound. The use of RDMAS during the surgical treatment of advanced purulent peritonitis not only prevents the suppuration of laparotomic wounds, but also significantly reduces the development of all types of adhesive disease caused by visceral and parietal peritoneal adhesions.
Conflict of interest: the authors declare no conflict of interest.
About the Authors
Vladimir M. Bensman
Kuban State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yurii P. Savchenko
Kuban State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Edgar A. Saakyan
Ust-Labinsk Central District Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Edgar A. Saakyan
tel.: +7 (961) 539-75-39; Krasnaya str., 228-27, Ust-Labinsk, 352330
References
1. Voskanyan S.E., Kyzlasov P.S. Profilaktika spaechnoi bolezni bryushnoi polosti — sovremennoe stoyanie problemy. Vestnik Khirurgii im. I.I. Grekova. 2011; 170(5): 93–96 (In Russ.).
2. Plechev V.V., Timerbulatov V.M., Kornilaev P.G. Spaechnaya bolezn’ bryushiny. In: Savel’ev S.V., ed. 80 lektsii po khirurgii. Moscow: Litterra; 2008: 456–467.
3. Baranov G.A., Karbovskii M.Yu. Quality of life among patients, operated on the reason of the adhesive ileus. Khirurgiya im. N.I. Pirogova. 2012; 9: 70–74 (In Russ., English Abstract).
4. Shal’kov Yu.L. Spaechnyi sindrom. Moscow: Binom; 2011: 240 (In Russ.).
5. Bensman V.M., Savchenko Y.P., Scherba S.N. et al. Choice way of closing a wound in the abdominal wall complex surgical treatment of peritonitis prevalence. Kubanskii Nauchnyi Meditsinskii Vestnik. 2015; 5: 19– 24 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.25207/1608- 6228-2015-5-19-24
6. Bensman V.M., Pavlenko S.G., Sijuhov Sh.T., Sсherba S.N. S»emnye razvyazyvayushchiesya dreniruyushchie aponevroticheskie shvy v komplekse profilaktiki nagnoeniya laparotomnykh ran. Kubanskii Nauchnyj Medicinskii Vestnik. 1995; 2–3: 41–44 (In Russ.).
7. Kanshin N.N. Nesformirovannye kishechnye svishchi i gnoinyi peritonit. Moscow: Profil’; 2007: 160 (In Russ.).
8. Avakimyan V.A., Karipidi G.K., Avakimyan S.V. et al. Programmed laparotomy in the treatment of general purulent peritonitis. Kubanskii Nauchnyj Medicinskii Vestnik. 2017; 24(6): 12–16 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.25207/1608-6228-2017- 24-6-12-16
9. Bensman V.M., Shcherba S.N. S”emnye dreniruyushchie aponevroticheskie i myshechno-aponevroticheskie shvy v profilaktike nagnoenii laparotomnykh ran. Vestnik Khirurgii im. I.I. Grekova. 2000; 159(1): 64–67 (In Russ.).
10. Saakyan A.S. Taktika ushivaniya laparotomnoi rany v urgentnoi abdominal’noi khirurgii. Kubanskii Nauchnyi Meditsinskii Vestnik. 1995; 2–3(9–10): 44–46 (In Russ.).
11. Pokrovskaya M.P., Makarov M.S. Tsitologiya ranevogo ekssudata kak pokazatel’ protsessa zazhivleniya ran. Moscow: Medgiz; 1942: 43 (In Russ.).
12. Savel’ev V.S., Gel’fand B.R., Filimonova M.I. Peritonit: Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. Moscow: Litterra; 2006: 208 (In Russ.).
13. Gorskii V.A., Volenko A.V., Faller A.P. et al. Tactical doctrine of treatment of patients with common peritonitis depending on microbial contamination of the abdominal cavity and the severity of paralytic intestinal obstruction. Sovremennaya Meditsina. 2018; 2(10): 133–138 (In Russ.).
14. Bensman V.M., Shal’kov Yu.L., Savchenko Yu.P. et al. Patomorfogenez spaechnoi bolezni i ego prikladnoe znachenie. Proceedings of the VIII All-Russian Conference of General Surgeons, Samara, May 14–17, 2014. Samara; 2014: 34–36 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Bensman V.M., Savchenko Yu.P., Saakyan E.A. THE ROLE OF LAPAROTOMIC WOUND INFECTION IN THE FORMATION OF PLANE VISCERAL AND PARIETAL ADHESIONS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ABDOMINAL ADHESIVE DISEASE IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PERITONITIS. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2019;26(1):67-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2019-26-1-67-76
Views:
417
Email this article 