Dynamics and Structure of Expert Panel Examinations in Medical Malpractice Cases in the Krasnodar Krai (2010–2018)

Aim. The paper analyses the dynamics and structure of forensic medical examinations conducted by an expert panel in cases involving medical malpractice in the Krasnodar Krai (2010– 2018).

Materials and methods. The authors studied the annual reports along with the archived copies of expert panel reports on the cases of medical malpractice submitted in 2010–2018 by the Department for Complex and Expert Panel Examinations (Bureau for Forensic Medical Examination, Krasnodar). The obtained results were processed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and SPSS Statistics Data Editor v.17.0. In this study, the authors employed the following methods: retrospective, comparative and analytical.

Results. In 2010–2018, a total of 1,023 expert panel examinations were conducted in cases involving medical malpractice. A steady increase in the number of examinations (from 36 in 2010 to 245 in 2018) is associated with the growing number of citizens complaining about the poor quality of medical care, the interest of judicial and investigation authorities in looking into such offences, etc. A direct cause-and-effect relationship between imperfect and erroneous healthcare delivery and ensuing adverse effects was established in 212 cases, whereas indirect or no relationship was determined in 130 and 644 cases, respectively. The number of examinations pertaining to criminal cases amounted to 29.1%, showing an increase by 3.5 times (from 16 in 2010 to 57 in 2018); while the number of examinations related to civil cases and those conducted during pre-investigation checks came to 18.2% and 52.7%, respectively.

Conclusion. The study shows a steady increase in the number of examinations related to medical malpractice (including criminal cases), which reveal a direct cause-and-effect relationship between errors in healthcare delivery and clinical outcomes

1. Indiaminov S.I., Davranova A.E. Some aspects of defects of rendering the surgical help. Zdobutki klіnіchnoї і eksperimental’noї meditsini. 2017; 3: 65–68. (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.11603/18112471.2017.v1.i3.7922

2. Erofeev S.V., Kamenskaya N.A., Malakhov N.V., Semenov A.S. Complexity and features of modern expert evaluation of adverseal outcomes of medical care. Aktual’nye Problemy Meditsiny i Biologii. 2018; 2: 79–82 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2587-4926-2018-10026

3. Idrisov N.T. To the question about criminal responsibility for improper provision of medical services in Russia: history, reality, perspectives. Meditsinskoe Pravo: Teoriya i Praktika. 2018; 4 (1(7): 66–71 (In Russ., English abstract).

4. Bastrykin A.I. Protivodeistvie prestupleniyam, sovershaemym meditsinskimi rabotnikami: problemy i puti ikh resheniya [Countering crimes committed by health professionals: problems and solutions]. Vestnik Akademii Sledstvennogo Komiteta Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2017; 1(11): 11–14 (In Russ.).

5. Bykhovskaya O.A., Filatov A.I., Loban I.E., Isakov V.D. The analysis of the commission forensic medical expertises concerning charges against healthcare providers. Sudebno-Meditsinskaya Ekspertiza. 2018; 61(5): 14–17 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.17116/sudmed20186105114

6. Mateikovich E.A., Shevlyukova T.P., Kukarskaya E.Yu., Galieva G.D. Medical errors with assurance of obstetric-gynecological assistance. Sovremennye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya. 2018; 5: 196 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.17513/spno.27991

7. Kalinin R.E., Barinov E.Kh. Forensic medical safety assessment of medical care: new requirements and new challenges. Meditsinskoe Pravo: Teoriya i Praktika. 2018; 4(1(7)): 77–83 (In Russ., English abstract).

8. Butova T.G., Yakovleva E.Yu., Danilina E.P., Zhil’nikova M.Yu. Assessment of medical service quality in the context of changing industrial statutory and legal regulations. Servis Plus. 2018; 12(1): 82–99 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.24411/2413-693X-201810109

9. Barinov Kh.E., Kalinin R.E., Romodanovskii P.O. Completeness and quality of the materials of the “medical” case as the key to the success of forensic medical examination. Aktual’nye Problemy Meditsiny i Biologii. 2018; 2: 70–72 (In Russ.).

10. Yurasov V.V., Smakhtin R.E. K voprosu o poryadke provedeniya sudebno-meditsinskikh ekspertiz po tak nazyvaemym “Vrachebnym delam” [To the question of the procedure for conducting forensic medical examinations in the so-called “medical cases”]. Problemy Ekspertizy v Meditsine. 2016; 16(01–02): 49–51 (In Russ.).

11. Getsmanova I.V. Pravovoe znachenie kosvennoi prichinno-sledstvennoi svyazi v sudebnoi praktike po delam o neblagopriyatnykh iskhodakh meditsinskikh vmeshatel’stv [The legal signifi cance of indirect causation in judicial practice in cases of adverse outcomes of medical interventions]. Vostochno-Evropeiskii Nauchnyi Vestnik. 2016; 1(5): 25–28 (In Russ.).

12. Farber E.V., Sergeev Yu.D., Shurupova R.V. The sociological and legal aspects of mistakes making by physicians and patients. Sotsiologiya Meditsiny. 2015; 14(2): 16–19 (In Russ., English abstract).

13. Novoselov V.P. About carrying out commission and complex expertises of inadequate rendering medical care and a role of the forensic medical experts in them. Vestnik Sudebnoi Meditsiny. 2014; 3(1): 5–10 (In Russ., English abstract).

14. Tyagunov D.V., Tyagunova I.F. Povody proizvodstva sudebno-meditsinskikh ekspertiz pri neblagopriyatnykh iskhodakh okazaniya meditsinskoi pomoshchi. Zdravookhranenie Yugry: Opyt i Innovatsii. 2017; 1(10): 37–44 (In Russ.).

15. Trukhacheva N.V. Meditsinskaya statistika: uchebnoe posobie [Medical statistics: a textbook]. Rostov n/Don: Feniks; 2017: 324 (In Russ.).