Microscopic Colitis. Common Features and Differences
https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2019-26-5-65-76
Abstract
Aim. To study the morpho-molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of microscopic colitis (MC), as well as to identify features of its two forms – collagenous and lymphocytic.
Material and methods. We studied biopsy samples from 23 patients exhibiting a clinical picture of irritable bowel syndrome; the material was obtained at the Endoscopic Department of the Region Clinic Hospital No. 2. The material was sampled from the five zones of the large intestine specified in the guidelines (Clinical Guidelines — Diagnosis and treatment of patients with digestive diseases, Appendix No. 3). The material was fixed in 10 % formalin, processed and embedded in paraffin. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (according to Mallory and Masson), as well as with picrosirius red, followed by the examination of these sections in polarised light. The immunohistochemical study was performed in line with the guidelines using monoclonal antibodies. Abcam antibodies (England) were used to detect type I and type III collagen; Cell Marque antibodies to CD4+ T and CD8+ T-lymphocytes (USA) were used to characterise lymphocytes.
Results. It has been established that fi broblasts in the lamina propria play a key role in the pathogenesis of collagenous MC. This cell population synthesises extracellular matrix and forms layers of collagen fibres in the area under the surface epithelium. Pericryptal fibroblasts are also activated. Their differentiation occurs simultaneously with the migration of epithelial cells to the surface of the crypts with a possible change in their cellular composition. Intercryptal fi broblasts provide an increase in the synthesis rate of type III collagen. In the case of lymphocytic colitis, the pathogenetic mechanism is based on the relationship between lymphocytes and the cells in the lamina propria. The outcome is determined by the type of activated lymphocytes. CD8+ lymphocytes infiltrate the epithelial lining, causing a reaction to the luminal component, whereas CD4+ lymphocytes act as helpers and populate the lamina propria in the area under the epithelium.
Conclusion. The pathogenesis of collagenous MC is based on the mechanism exhibited by the fibroblasts in the colon lamina propria, whereas the pathogenesis of lymphocytic colitis is determined by the dynamics of CD4+ T and CD8+ T-lymphocyte subpopulations.
About the Authors
Galina M. Mogil’nayaRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Head of the Department of Histology and Embryology
Mitrofanа Sedina str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063
Vladimir M. Durleshter
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Surgery Department No. 3, Faculty of Advanced Training and Occupational Retraining; Deputy Chief Surgeon
Mitrofanа Sedina str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063; Krasnykh partizan str., 6/2, Krasnodar, 350012
Vera L. Mogil’naya
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), board-certified gastroenterologist (highest category)
Odesskaya str., 48/1, Krasnodar, 350020
Lida K. Kovaleva
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Research Assistant, Department of Histology and Embryology
Geroya Vladislava Posadskogo str., 32-125, Krasnodar, 350000; tel.: +7 (918) 437-34-36
Lyudmila G. Dryaeva
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department for Morbid Anatomy
Krasnykh partizan str., 6/2, Krasnodar, 350012
References
1. Münch A., Aust D., Bohr J., Bonderup O., Bañares F.F., Hjortswang H., Madisch A., Munck L.K., Ström M., Tysk C., Miehlke S. Microscopic colitis: Current status, present and future challenges: statements of the European Microscopic Colitis Group. J. Crohns. Colitis. 2012; 6(9): 932–945. DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.05.014
2. Langner C., Aust D., Ensari A., Villanacci V., Becheanu G., Miehlke S., Geboes K., Münch A. Histology of microscopic colitis-review with a practical approach for pathologists. Histopathology. 2015; 66(5): 613–626. DOI: 10.1111/his.12592
3. Fiehn A.M., Bjørnbak C., Warnecke M., Engel P.J., Munck L.K. Observer variability in the histopathologic diagnosis of microscopic colitis and subgroups. Hum. Pathol. 2013; 44(11): 2461–2466. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.06.004
4. Münch A., Langner C. Microscopic colitis: clinical and pathologic perspectives. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015; 13(2): 228–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.12.026
5. Józefczuk J., Woźniewicz B.M. Diagnosis and therapy of microscopic colitis with presence of foamy macrophages in children. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2011; 2011: 756292. DOI: 10.5402/2011/756292
6. Fiehn A.M., Bjørnbak C., Warnecke M., Engel P.J., Munck L.K. Observer variability in the histopathologic diagnosis of microscopic colitis and subgroups. Hum. Pathol. 2013; 44(11): 2461–2466. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.06.004
7. Batista L., Ruiz L., Ferrer C., Zabana Y., Aceituno M., Arau B., Andújar X., Esteve M., Fernández-Bañares F. Usefulness of fecal calprotectin as a biomarker of microscopic colitis in a cohort of patients with chronic watery diarrhoea of functional characteristics. Dig. Liver. Dis. 2019. PII: S1590-8658(19)30686-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.07.002
8. Engel P.J.H., Fiehn A.K., Munck L.K., Kristensson M. The subtypes of microscopic colitis from a pathologist’s perspective: past, present and future. Ann. Transl. Med. 2018; 6(3): 69. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.16
9. Farrukh A., Mayberry J.F. Microscopic colitis: a review. Colorectal. Dis. 2014; 16(12): 957–964. DOI: 10.1111/codi.12716
10. Koroy P.V., Yagoda A.V. Modernparadigm of microscopic colitis. Medical News of the North Caucasus. 2016; 11(4): 599–605 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.14300/mnnc.2016.11148
11. Kulygina Y.A., Skalinskaya M.I., Ageeva T.A. Microscopiccolitis: the clinical case. Eksperimental’naya i Klinicheskaya Gastroenterologiya. 2015; 3(115): 101–105 (In Russ., English abstract).
12. Arnim U., Wex T., Ganzert C., Schulz C., Malfertheiner P. Fecal calprotectin: a marker for clinical differentiation of microscopic colitis and irritable bowel syndrome. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 2016; 9: 97–103. DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S97701
13. Boland K., Nguyen G.C. Microscopic colitis: a review of collagenous and lymphocytic colitis. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017; 13(11): 671–677.
14. Kumawat A.K., Strid H., Elgbratt K., Tysk C., Bohr J., Hörnquist H.E. Microscopic colitis patients have increased proportions of Ki67(+) proliferating and CD45RO(+) active/memory CD8(+) and CD4(+)8(+) mucosal T cells. J. Crohns. Colitis. 2013; 7(9): 694–705. DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2012.08.014
15. Mahajan D., Goldblum J.R., Xiao S.Y., Shen B., Liu X. Lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis: a review ofclinicopathologic features and immunologic abnormalities. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2012; 19(1): 28–38. DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31823d7705
16. Prikaz Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 09.11.2012 g. № 774n «Ob utverzhdenii standarta spetsializirovannloi meditsinskoi pomoshchi pri sindrome razdrazhennogo kishechnika (s diareei)». [Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated November 9, 2012 No. 774n “On approval of the standard of specialized medical care for irritable bowel syndrome (with diarrhea)”]. Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii; 2015 (updated 26.05.2015). Available mode: https://www.rosminzdrav.ru/documents/9001-prikaz-ministerstva-zdravoohraneniya-rossiyskoy-federatsii-ot-9-noyabrya-2012-g-774n-ob-utverzhdenii-standarta-spetsializirovannoy-meditsinskoy-pomoschi-pri-sindrome-razdrazhennogo-kishechnika-s-diareey (In Russ.).
17. Kiernan J.A. Histological and Histochemical Methods: Theory and Practice. 5 th ed. Gdansk: Scion Publishing; 2015. 571 p.
Review
For citations:
Mogil’naya G.M., Durleshter V.M., Mogil’naya V.L., Kovaleva L.K., Dryaeva L.G. Microscopic Colitis. Common Features and Differences. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2019;26(5):65-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2019-26-5-65-76