Study of the dimensional accuracy of jaw models obtained by 3d printing using stereolithography
https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2020-27-1-40-48
Abstract
Aim. To study the dimensional accuracy of dentition models produced by digital and conventional methods using an experimental model and digital technologies.
Materials and methods. This article presents an assessment of the dimensional accuracy of jaw models created using an Asiga Max UV 3D printer from digital images of dentition created by an iTero Cadent intraoral scanner and plaster jaw models obtained from one-stage two-layer A-silicone impressions. The DentalCAD software and the Meshlab computer program were used to study the dimensional accuracy of the as-obtained digital images. The nonparametric Wilcoxon rank test was used for statistical analysis of the obtained data.
Results. It is established that jaw models made of DETAX Freeprint model UV photopolymer using an Asiga Max UV 3D printer, based on digital impressions obtained by an iTero Cadent intraoral scanner, have a greater dimensional accuracy in comparison with plaster jaw models obtained from single-stage double-layer A-silicone impressions by 31.6% with a signifi cance level p < 0.05.
Conclusion. Jaw models created using an Asiga Max UV 3D printer are characterized by high dimensional accuracy as compared to plaster models.
About the Authors
Evgeny N. Zhulev
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Department of Orthopaedic Dentistry and Orthodontics,
Minina i Pozharskogo square, 10/1, Nizhny Novgorod
Yuliya A. Vokulova
Polyclinic No. 2 of the Federal Customs Service of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Departmental Head, Dentistry Department, Orthopaedic dentist,
Artelnaya str., 2, Nizhny Novgorod
References
1. Shustova V.A., Shustov M.A. Application of 3D-technologies in orthopedic dentistry. Satnt Peterburg: SpetsLit; 2016. 159 p. (In Russ.).
2. Karyakin N.N., Gorbatov R.O. 3D printing in medicine. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. 240 p. (In Russ.).
3. Zhulev E.N., Vokulova Y.A. Evaluation of the accuracy of obtaining impressions of the dentition with the use of technology of laser scanning. Sovremennye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya. 2016; 5: 164 (In Russ., English abstract).
4. Zhulev E.N., Vokulova Y. A. Evaluation of dimensionalaccuracy digital impressions obtained using the intraoral scanner ITERO. Mezhdunarodnyi Zhurnal Prikladnykh i Fundamental’nykh Issledovanii. 2016; 12-2: 257–261 (In Russ., English abstract). 5. Zhulev E.N., Vokulova Y.A. Comparative evaluation of impressions’ dimensional accuracy in the experiment. Dental Forum. 2017; 1: 38–42 (In Russ., English abstract).
5. Ryakhovskiy A.N. Digital Dentistry. Moscow: Avantis; 2010. 282 p. (In Russ.).
6. Aspert N., Santa-Cruz D., Ebrahimi T. MESH: Measuring Errors between Surfaces using the Hausdorff Distance. Proc. IEEE ICME. 2002; 705–708. DOI: 10.1109/icme.2002.1035879
7. Oniga E., Chirila C. Hausdorff Distance for the Differences Calculation Between 3D Surfaces. Journal of Geodesy and Cadastre RevCAD. 2013; 15:193–202. 9. Mikhaylov I.A. Image recognition using a radial neighborhood method. Komp’yuternaya Optika. 2010. 34(3): 399–407 (In Russ., English abstract).
Review
For citations:
Zhulev E.N., Vokulova Yu.A. Study of the dimensional accuracy of jaw models obtained by 3d printing using stereolithography. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2020;27(1):40-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2020-27-1-40-48
Views:
839
Email this article 