V-NOTES technique in tubal pregnancy: a clinical case

Background. Ectopic are 3% of all pregnancies, with 4.1–10% of them entailing lethal consequences, which exposes the imperfection of current operative techniques. v-NOTES (vaginal— natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) is an emerging surgical technique offering solutions to achieve a good aesthetic effect coupled with a minimally invasive intervention and fewer trocar-associated complications. This article presents our first clinical experience with v-NOTES in a patient with tubal pregnancy.
Clinical case description. Patient V., 28 yo, a first-time pregnancy, admitted emergently with complaints of genital bloody discharge and abdominal pain. Beta-hCG 2,200 mU/mL on examination, with a 48-h increase by 400 U. In ultrasound (US): pregnancy not located in uterine cavity, an inclusion (gestational sac?) visualised extraovarially on the right from uterus. Progressive right tubal pregnancy in repeated US.
The patient was advised with v-NOTES as a surgical procedure. An informed voluntary consent has been obtained.
A posterior colpotomy with intra-abdominal port placement was performed under endotracheal anaesthesia in lithotomy position. CO₂ insufflation to 14 mmHg. Laparoscopy revealed about 30 mL liquid blood in Douglas pouch of abdominal cavity; sanitated. Ampulla of right fallopian tube contained a 2.5 x 1.5 cm bluish-coloured gestational sac. Right antegrade tubectomy performed with ultrasonic scissors and a bipolar clamp for the specimen evacuation via port. Colporrhaphy. Blood loss 35 mL, surgery time 35 min. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score 2 in first postoperative 24 h. The patient was discharged on day 2.
Conclusion. v-NOTES is an emerging surgical technique alternative to laparoscopic access, which combines the benefits of minimal invasiveness and good aesthetics. More surgical practice and multicentre trials are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

1. Hendriks E., Rosenberg R., Prine L. Ectopic Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Management. Am. Fam. Physician. 2020; 101(10): 599–606. PMID: 32412215.

2. Mukhiddinov N.D., Ismoilov M.M., Gulin A.V., Nazirboeva O.Y, Saidov M.S. Modern data regarding the etiology, diagnostics and pathological influence of the pipe forms of innovative pregnancy on reproductive health of women (literature review). Tambov University Reports Series: Natural and Technical Sciences. 2017; 22(6-2): 1654–1660 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.20310/1810-0198-2017-22-6-1654-1660

3. Sivalingam V.N., Duncan W.C., Kirk E., Shephard L.A., Horne A.W. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. J. Fam. Plann. Reprod. Health. Care. 2011; 37(4): 231–340. DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-0073

4. Gynecology: a national guide. Short edition. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Editors: G.M. Savel’eva, G.T. Sukhikh, V.N. Serov, V.E. Radzinskiy, I.B. Manukhin. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2020. 1056 р. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33029/9704-5739-9-GIN-2020-1-056

5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 200: Early Pregnancy Loss. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 132(5): e197–e207. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002899

6. Ghelichkhani, P., Yousefifard, M., Nazemi, L., Safari, S., Hosseini, M., Baikpour, M., Salamati Ghamsari, S., Yaseri, M. The Value of Serum Β-Subunit of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Level in Prediction of Treatment Response to Methotrexate in Management of Ectopic Pregnancy; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2016; 4(9): 3503–3518. DOI: 10.22038/ijp.2016.7409

7. Autorino R., Yakoubi R., White W.M., Gettman M., De Sio M., Quattrone C,. Di Palma C., Izzo A., Correia-Pinto J., Kaouk J.H., Lima E. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): where are we going? A bibliometric assessment. BJU Int. 2013; 111(1): 11– 16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11494.x

8. Shen Z., Liu C., Zhao L., Xu L., Peng B., Chen Z., Li X., Zhou J. Minimally-invasive management of intramural ectopic pregnancy: an eight-case series and literature review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020; 253: 180–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.021

9. Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 21. BJOG. 2016; 123(13): e15–e55. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14189

10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the Society forMaternal-FetalMedicin. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019; 133(2): e97–e109. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003070

11. Nieboer T.E., Johnson N., Lethaby A., Tavender E., Curr E., Garry R., van Voorst S., Mol B.W., Kluivers K.B. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009; 3: CD003677. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4

12. Webster K., Eadon H., Fishburn S., Kumar G.; Guideline Committee. Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2019; 367: l6283. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6283

13. Clark M.P., Qayed E.S., Kooby D.A., Maithel S.K., Willingham F.F. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery in humans: a review. Minim. Invasive. Surg. 2012; 2012: 189296. DOI: 10.1155/2012/189296

14. Sarah, V.P., Jan, B. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy: a first series demonstrating how a new surgical technique can be applied in a low-resource setting. Gynecol. Surg. 2015; 12: 299–302. DOI: 10.1007/s10397-015-0904-6

15. Chen X., Liu H., Sun D., Zhang J.J., Fan Q., Shi H., Lang J. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Tubal Pregnancy and a Device Innovation from Our Institution. J. Minim. Invasive. Gynecol. 2019; 26(1): 169–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.05.013