PECULIARITIES OF ANAMNESIS AND COMPLICATIONS OF PREGNANCY IN THE I-II TRIMESTERS AND PRETERM BIRTH RISK
https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2017-24-4-150-155
Abstract
Aim. Assess the significance of anamnestic data and complications of gestation in I-II trimesters in predicting PL depending on the gestational age.
Materials and methods. A prospective comparative study was carried out at the clinical bases of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of postgraduate education of the Kuban State Medical University (Krasnodar): in the Perinatal Centers of the Children's Regional Clinical Hospital (DKKB) and the Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2 (KKB No. 2). The perinatal center of theRegionalClinicalHospital "DKKB" (Krasnodar) is specialized in premature birth in theKrasnodarTerritory. Women with preterm labor (ICD code-O60) included in the study were divided into four groups included depending on the gestational age: very early premature births (22-276days, n = 37 women), early premature births (28-306 days) weeks, n = 40 women), premature birth (30-336 days, n = 38 women), late premature birth (33-366 days, n = 35 women). The control group consisted of conditionally healthy women with a full term of pregnancy and with physiological births (37- 403 days of weeks, n = 50).
Results. The importance of pregnancy complications in I-II trimesters as risk factors for premature birth was established. Prophylaxis, timely diagnosis and treatment of these complications may be a measure of a decrease in the frequency of PL, or an increase in the duration of pregnancy with PL.
Conclusion. Prophylaxis, timely diagnosis and treatment of these complications may be a measure of a reduction in the frequency of preterm labor or an increase in the duration of pregnancy in preterm labor.
About the Authors
E. P. CherepakhinRussian Federation
Perinatal Center
Corresponding author: Evgeniy P. Cherepakhin
18 Postovaya str., Krasnodar, 350063; tel.: 8(861) 262-34-58
V. A. Novikova
Russian Federation
4 Sedina St., Krasnodar
D. V. Tomaszewski
Russian Federation
Perinatal Center
18 Postovaya str., 350063, Krasnodar
V. A. Khorolsky
Russian Federation
4 Sedina St., Krasnodar
A. A. Yugina
Russian Federation
4 Sedina St., Krasnodar
References
1. Ailamazyan E.K., Kuzminykh T.U. Discussion questions of premature odes.Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2013; 4:97-105. (In Russ., English abstract).
2. Letter of the Ministry of Health of Russia dated December 17, 2013. №15-4/10/2-9480. Premature birth. Clinical recommendations (protocol of treatment). 2013. 20 p. (In Russ.).
3. Padrul M.M., Olin A.A., Klyausova E.G. et al. Preventing premature birth in the first trimester of pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 10:107-111. (In Russ., English abstract).
4. Zamotina I.V., Messiah N.V., PolubentsevD.Yu. et al. Efficiency of conservative and surgical correction of ischemic-cervical insufficiency. Reproductive health of children and adolescents. 2014; 5: 49-53. (In Russ., English abstract).
5. Tetruashvili N.K., Agadzhanova A.A., Milusheva A.K. Correction of Isthmiko cervical insufficiency in the prolapse of the fetal bladder: the possibility of therapy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 9: 106-109. (In Russ., English abstract).
6. Lomova N.A., Milaya O.V., Kan N.E. et al. Diagnostic significance of the definition of proinflammatory cytokines for evaluation of the risk of realization of intrauterine infection in deep-seated newborns. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 9: 73-79. (In Russ., English abstract).
7. Drukker N.A., Linde V.A., Zenkina Z.V. et al. Participation of proinflammatory cytokines of the amniotic fluid in the regulation of nitric oxide levels in premature delivery. Russian bulletin of the obstetrician-gynecologist. 2013; 6: 16-18. (In Russ., English abstract).
8. Iams J.D., Goldenberg R.L., Meis P.J. et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 29; 334 (9): 567- 72.
9. Borg F., Gravino G., Schembri-Wismayer P. et al. Prediction of preterm birth. Minerva Ginecol. 2013 Jun; 65 (3): 345-60. Review.
10. Lee K.A., Chang M.H., Park M.H. et al. A model for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Dec; 20(12): 1825-31. DOI: 10.1089/ jwh.2011.2729. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
11. Sananes N., Langer B., Gaudineau A. et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies: where are we and where are we going? A review of literature. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Aug; 34(6): 457-61. DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2014.896325. Review.
12. ChanRonna L. Biochemical Markers of Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Asymptomatic Women. BioMed Research International. Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 164081, 8 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/164081.
Review
For citations:
Cherepakhin E.P., Novikova V.A., Tomaszewski D.V., Khorolsky V.A., Yugina A.A. PECULIARITIES OF ANAMNESIS AND COMPLICATIONS OF PREGNANCY IN THE I-II TRIMESTERS AND PRETERM BIRTH RISK. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2017;(4):150-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2017-24-4-150-155