MANAGEMENT OF PREGNANCY AND LABOR IN MYOPIC PATIENTS
https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2018-25-1-108-110
Abstract
Aim. To study the course of pregnancy and labor in women suffering from myopia.
Materials and methods. A comparative analysis of pregnancy outcomes among 100 women with myopia was held. There were 48 women in the study group who had a retinal laser correction within the period of pregnancy. The control group was represented by 52 women who did not undergo the correction.
Results. We noted that the peripheral laser retinopexy made possible labor through natural birth canals for women of the study group. While the control group of women underwent abdominal delivery.
Conclusion. The problem of myopia during pregnancy remains the focus of attention of obstetricians and ophthalmologists, since it is very important to choose the optimal method of delivery. In this case it is necessary to take into account not only the degree of myopia, but also the state of the retina. Peripheral vitreochorioretinal dystrophic changes (PVCDC) are indication for cesarean section. It was found that the timely use of LRP for retina makes possible reducing the percentage of surgical delivery, and thereby reduces the risk of post-surgery complications.
About the Authors
G. M. PERTSEVA
Fedearal State Budgetary Education Institution of Higher Professional Education “Rostov State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nakhichevansky per., 29, Rostov-on-Don, 344022.
A. A. BORSHCHEVA
Fedearal State Budgetary Education Institution of Higher Professional Education “Rostov State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Nakhichevansky per., 29, Rostov-on-Don, 344022.
Russian Federation
Nakhichevansky per., 29, Rostov-on-Don, 344022.
I. S. YAN-CHOBANYAN
Fedearal State Budgetary Education Institution of Higher Professional Education “Rostov State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation
Nakhichevansky per., 29, Rostov-on-Don, 344022.
Russian Federation
Nakhichevansky per., 29, Rostov-on-Don, 344022.
References
1. Астахов Ю.С., Ангелопуло Г.В., Джалиашвили О.А. Глазные болезни: Для врачей общей практики: Справочное пособие. СПб.: СпецЛит; 2001. 240 с: [Astachov Y.S, Angelopulo G.V., Dzhaliashvili O.A. Eye diseases for general practitioners. Spb.: SpecLit; 2001. 240 p.].
2. Безденежных В.Н. Миопия – проблема XXI века. Молодой ученый. 2015; 24: 253-255. https://moluch.ru/archive/104/24236/ [Bezdenezhnyh O.A. Myopia – problem of the 21stcentury. The young scientist. 2015; 24: 253-255. (In Russ.) https://moluch.ru/ archive/104/24236/].
3. Магогон А.С. Изменение органа зрения при нормальной и патологически протекающей беременности. Вестник Сибирской офтальмологии. 2012; 1: 43-45. [Magogon A.S. Change in the visual organ in normal and pathologically pregnancy. Bulletin of Siberian ophthalmology. 2012; 1: 43-45. (In Russ.)].
4. Коленко О.В., Сорокин Е.Л., Егоров В.В. Влияние преэклампсии на параметры макулярной сетчатки. Современные технологии в офтальмологии. 2015; 2: 202-206. http://www. eyepress.ru/0003240/sto_0215_s.pdf [Kolenko O.V., Sorokin E.L., Egorov V.V. Effect of pre-eclampsia on the parameters of the macular retina. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2015; 2: 202206. (In Russ.) http://www.eyepress.ru/0003240/sto_0215_s.pdf].
5. Коленко О.В. Сорокин. Е.Л. Родоразрешение при миопии у беременных женщин, выбор тактики. Офтальмохирургия. 2016; 3: 64-68. http://www.eyepress.ru/article.aspx?21846 [Kolenko O.V., Sorokin E.L., Delivery of pregnant women with myopia, a choice of tactics. Ophthalmic surgery. 2016; 3: 64-68. (In Russ.) http://www.eyepress.ru/article.aspx?21846].
6. Синчихин С.П., Степанян Л.В., Рамазанова Л.Ш., Мамиев О.Б., Напылова О.А. Проблемы женского здоровья. 2016; 11(2): 36-45. [Sinchihin S.P., Stepanyan L.V., Ramazanova L.Sh., Mamiev O.B., Napylova O.A. Pregnancy and childbirth in women with pathology of organs of vision. Problems of women’s health. 2016; 11(2): 36-45. (In Russ.)].
7. Иомдина Е.Н., Тарутта Е.П. Современные направления фундаментальных исследований патогенеза прогрессирующей миопии. Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук. 2014; 69(3-4): 44-49. [Iomdina E.N., Tarutta E.P. Modern directions of fundamental studies of the pathogenesis of progressive myopia. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2014; 69(34): 44-49. (In Russ.)].
8. Рочева С.Л. Выбор метода родоразрешения у женщин с миопией различной степени. Вести офтальмологии. 2006; 3: 47-51. https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_23836409_20977761. pdf [Rocheva C.L. The choice of the method of delivery of women with varying degrees of myopia. News of ophthalmology. 2006; 3: 47-51. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_23836409_20977761.pdf].
Review
For citations:
PERTSEVA G.M., BORSHCHEVA A.A., YAN-CHOBANYAN I.S. MANAGEMENT OF PREGNANCY AND LABOR IN MYOPIC PATIENTS. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2018;25(1):108-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2018-25-1-108-110
Views:
760
Email this article 