Vacuum-assisted laparostomy with staged peritoneal lavage in management of secondary postoperative diffuse peritonitis: a prospective comparative non-randomised clinical trial

Background. Secondary postoperative diffuse peritonitis (SPDP) associates with a high incidence of abdominal sepsis and 35–92% mortality rate. An optimal surgical doctrine in this complication in lacking to date.

Objectives. An efficacy assessment of vacuum-assisted laparostomy (VAL) with staged lavage relative to relaparotomy on demand (RD) in SPDP patients.

Methods. Patient enrolment and analyses were conducted within period 01.11.2017-31.12.2020, totalling for 141 SPDP patients, 77 (54.6%) males and 64 (45.4%) females aged 64.5 (5972.7) years. Cohort I patients (n = 52) had post-abdominal-lavage VAL using Suprasorb® SNP (SNP-1 and SNP-2) equipment and consumables (Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH, Austria). Staged lavage was performed 48-72 h apart. Cohort II (n = 78) had a standard RD  technique. Cohort III (n = 11) treatment included RD-to-VAL transition. The endpoint was the inpatient treatment outcome, a favourable completion or death. The additional estimated criteria were complications rate and severity (in ACCORDION-modified Clavien-Dindo classification), sepsis rate, C-reactive protein level, abdominal index dynamics, patient’s intensive-care and total-hospital lengths of stay.

Results. Cohort I included 157 staged-lavage VALs, cohort II — 107 RDs, cohort III — 49 operations. The mortality rate was 3/52 (5.8%), 24/78 (30.8%) and 7/11 (63.6%) in cohorts I, II and III (respectively, p < 0.001). No difference was observed in the length of hospital stay, with a shorter intensive care stay after final abdominal closure in cohort I. Clavien — Dindo grade 3a complications were observed for 25.0% of cohort I, 60.3 and 45.5% — of cohorts II and III (respectively, p < 0.01); grade 3b complications were 0 (0%), 24.4 and 100% in cohorts I, II and III (respectively, p < 0.001; all 11 patients were reoperated). Multiple organ failure (grade 4b) was reported in 5.8, 30.8 and 63.6% of cohorts I, II and III (respectively, p < 0.001). By end of treatment, sepsis had resolved in 9/11 (81.8%) patients in cohort I, 5/24 (20.8%) and 1/6 (16.7%) — in cohorts II and III (respectively, p = 0.002).

Conclusion. Programmed staged-lavage VAL is an optimal surgical treatment tactics in SPDP. Relative to RD, VAL provides a more effective management of local and systemic abdominal sepsis, lower mortality, fewer and less sever complications, shorter intensive care stays after abdominal closure.

1. Kit O.I., Gevorkyan Yu.A., Soldatkina N.V., Kolesnikov E.N., Kharagezov D.A., Kolesnikov V.E., Kozhushko M.A. Stapling interintestinal anastomosis in colorectal cancer: short-term results. Koloproktologia. 2016; 1: 48–53 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2016-0-1-48-53

2. Zaborowski A.M., Stakelum A., Winter D.C. Anastomotic leak risk in complete responders to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 36(4): 671–676. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03833-w

3. Ross J.T., Matthay M.A., Harris H.W. Secondary peritonitis: principles of diagnosis and intervention. BMJ. 2018; 361: k1407. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k1407

4. Clements T.W., Tolonen M., Ball C.G., Kirkpatrick A.W. Secondary Peritonitis and Intra-Abdominal Sepsis: An Increasingly Global Disease in Search of Better Systemic Therapies. Scand. J. Surg. 2021; 110(2): 139–149. DOI: 10.1177/1457496920984078

5. Sartelli M., Griffiths E.A., Nestori M. The challenge of post-operative peritonitis after gastrointestinal surgery. Updates Surg. 2015; 67(4): 373–381. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-015-0324-1

6. Balogh Z.J. Damage Control Surgery for Non-Trauma Patients: Severe Peritonitis Management. World J. Surg. 2021; 45(4): 1053–1054. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-05960-5

7. van Ruler O., Boermeester M.A. Surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis: A continuing problem. Chirurg. 2017; 88(Suppl 1): 1–6. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-015-0121-x

8. Rogers W.K., Garcia L. Intraabdominal Hypertension, Abdominal Compartment Syndrome, and the Open Abdomen. Chest. 2018; 153(1): 238–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.07.023

9. Coccolini F., Roberts D., Ansaloni L., Ivatury R., Gamberini E., Kluger Y., Moore E.E., Coimbra R., Kirkpatrick A.W., Pereira B.M., Montori G., Ceresoli M., Abu-Zidan F.M., Sartelli M., Velmahos G., Fraga G.P., Leppaniemi A., Tolonen M., Galante J., Razek T., Maier R., Bala M., Sakakushev B., Khokha V., Malbrain M., Agnoletti V., Peitzman A., Demetrashvili Z., Sugrue M., Di Saverio S., Martzi I., Soreide K., Biffl W., Ferrada P., Parry N., Montravers P., Melotti R.M., Salvetti F., Valetti T.M., Scalea T., Chiara O., Cimbanassi S., Kashuk J.L., Larrea M., Hernandez J.A.M., Lin H.F., Chirica M., Arvieux C., Bing C., Horer T., De Simone B., Masiakos P., Reva V., DeAngelis N., Kike K., Balogh Z.J., Fugazzola P., Tomasoni M., Latifi R., Naidoo N., Weber D., Handolin L., Inaba K., Hecker A., Kuo-Ching Y., Ordoñez C.A., Rizoli S., Gomes C.A., De Moya M., Wani I., Mefire A.C., Boffard K., Napolitano L., Catena F. The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: WSES guidelines. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2018; 13: 7. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0167-4

10. Yadav S., Rawal G., Baxi M. Vacuum assisted closure technique: a short review. Pan. Afr. Med. J. 2017; 28: 246. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.246.9606

11. Seternes A., Rekstad L.C., Mo S., Klepstad P., Halvorsen D.L., Dahl T., Björck M., Wibe A. Open Abdomen Treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Indications, Management and Survival. World J. Surg. 2017; 41(1): 152–161. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3694-8

12. Mayhew D., Mendonca V., Murthy B.V.S. A review of ASA physical status — historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia. 2019; 74(3): 373–379. DOI: 10.1111/anae.14569

13. Petersen S., Huber M., Storni F., Puhl G., Deder A., Prause A., Schefold J.C., Doll D., Schober P., Luedi M.M. Outcome in patients with open abdomen treatment for peritonitis: a multidomain approach outperforms single domain predictions. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00743-8. Epub ahead of print.

14. Krylov N.N., Babkin O.V., Babkin D.O. Mannheim peritonitis index as a surgical criterion for perforative duodenal ulcer. Khirurgiya. 2016; 7: 18–22 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2016718-22

15. Neri A., Fusario D., Marano L., Savelli V., Bartalini Cinughi de Pazzi A., Cassetti D., Roviello F., Marrelli D. Clinical evaluation of the Mannheim Prognostic Index in post-operative peritonitis: a prospective cohort study. Updates. Surg. 2020; 72(4): 1159–1166. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00831-5

16. Basile-Filho A., Lago A.F., Menegueti M.G., Nicolini E.A., Rodrigues L.A.B., Nunes R.S., Auxiliadora-Martins M., Ferez M.A. The use of APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS 3, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, and lactate to predict mortality of surgical critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(26): e16204. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016204

17. Sigua B.V., Zemlyanoy V.P., Petrov S.V., Ignatenko V.A., Kotkov P.A. Surgical Aspects of the Treatment of Patients With Generalized Peritonitis. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal «Emergency Medical Care». 2021; 10(1): 58–65 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.23934/2223-9022-2021-10-1-58-65

18. Godínez-Vidal A.R., Alcántara-Gordillo R., Aguirre-Rojano V.I., López-Romero S.C., González-Calatayud M., González-Pérez L.G., Pulido-Cejudo A., Gracida-Mancilla N.I. Evaluation of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and the PCR/PCT index as indicators of mortality in abdominal sepsis. Cir. Cir. 2020; 88(2): 150–153. DOI: 10.24875/CIRU.19000993

19. Kazaryan A.M., Akopov A.L., Rosok B., Postriganova N.D., Edvin B. Russian edition of the classification of complications in surgery. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2014; 173(2): 86–91 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2014-173-2-86-91

20. Tartaglia D., Marin J.N., Nicoli A.M., De Palma A., Picchi M., Musetti S., Cremonini C., Salvadori S., Coccolini F., Chiarugi M. Predictive factors of mortality in open abdomen for abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study on 113 patients. Updates Surg. 2021; 73(5): 1975–1982. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01012-8

21. Batyrshin I.M., Shlyapnikov S.A., Demko A.E., Ostroumova Yu.S., Sklizkov D.S., Fomin D.V., Tishkov A.V., Strakh L.V. Prediction and differentiated approach in the treatment of patients with secondary peritonitis and abdominal sepsis. Khirurgiya. 2020; 5: 27–33 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202005127

22. Jannasch O., Meyer F., Fuellert A., König B., Eder F., Tautenhahn J. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) for postoperative secondary peritonitis: Effect on bacterial load as well as local and systemic cytokine response (initial results). Pol. Przegl. Chir. 2018; 90(5): 27–35. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.1751

23. Chopra K., Gowda A.U., Morrow C., Holton L. 3rd, Singh D.P. The Economic Impact of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in High-Risk Abdominal Incisions: A Cost-Utility Analysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016; 137(4): 1284–1289. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002024

24. Poillucci G., Podda M., Russo G., Perri S.G., Ipri D., Manetti G., Lolli M.G., De Angelis R. Open abdomen closure methods for severe abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. Eur. J. Trauma. Emerg. Surg. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01379-0. Epub ahead of print.

25. Berrevoet F., Lampaert S., Singh K., Jakipbayeva K., van Cleven S., Vanlander A. Early Initiation of a Standardized Open Abdomen Treatment With Vacuum Assisted Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Best Results. Front. Surg. 2021; 7: 606539. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.606539