THE COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THE STRUCTURE OF SCARRING TISSUE OF THE SURGICAL WOUND CLOSED WITH THE PROLONGED FLOW ASPIRATION DRAINAGE OF SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE
https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2017-24-3-128-131
Abstract
Aim. To give the morphological characteristic of scarring tissue of the surgical wound closed with the prolonged flow aspiration drainage (PFAD) of subcutaneous tissue and without it.
Material and methods. The study involved 40 outbred rabbits (20 in the main group, 20 in the control one). Histomorphological evaluation of tissue blocks of surgical wounds of the anterior abdominal wall, taken on the 15th, 20th, 25th and 30th post-surgery days, was carried out.
Results. Formation of granulation tissue and scarring of wounds of the animals in the main group, to which PFAD of subcutaneous tissue was applied, occurred alongside less destructive inflammations. The free space, on the place of a removed flowing drainage of the surgical wound, was gradually filled with granulation tissue, and then with the cicatricial one; and by 25 – 30 days after surgery it merged with the total cicatricial mass, without leaving any free cavities.
Conclusion. PFAD of subcutaneous tissue of surgical wounds promotes favorable regeneration and less complicated post-surgery period in comparison with the surgical wounds closed in the traditional layer-by-layer tight way.
About the Authors
S. N. SСHERBA
FSBEI HE Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of General Surgery
Russia, 350036, Krasnodar, Sedina street, 4
E. A. DIMOVA
Children's regional hospital, Ministry of Health of Krasnodar Krai
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russia, 350063, Krasnodar, Ploschad Pobedy 1; tel.: 8-918-417-29-51
V. M. BENSMAN
FSBEI HE Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of General Surgery
Russia, 350036, Krasnodar, Sedina street, 4
Yu. P. SAVCHENKO
FSBEI HE Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of General Surgery
Russia, 350036, Krasnodar, Sedina street, 4
References
1. Zaharchenko A.A., Vinnik Ju.S., Shtoppel' A.Je. i dr. Kompleks profilaktiki gnojnoj hirurgicheskoj infekcii v kombinirovannom lechenii raka prjamoj kishki. Materialy VII Vserossijskoj konferencii obshhih hirurgov. Krasnojarsk. 2012; 648-651. (In Russ.)
2. Gostischev V. K., Dibirov M. D., Hachatryan N. N. I dr. Novye vozmozhnosti profilaktiki posleoperacionnyh oslozhnenij v abdominal'noj hirurgii. Surgery. 2011; (5): 56-60. (In Russ.)
3. Maskin S. S., Karsanov A.M., Aydarova L. G., et al. Optimizacija perioperacionnoj antibakterial'noj himioterapii pri obturacionnoj tolstokishechnoj neprohodimosti. Herald of surgical gastroenterology. 2011; (3): 64. (In Russ.)
4. Shherba S.N., Polovinkin V.V. Vlijanie protochnogo prolongirovannogo drenirovanija na zazhivlenie laparotomnyh ran u bol'nyh s kolorektal'nym rakom. Vestnik hirurgii im. Grekova. 2012; 171(6): 59-61. (In Russ.)
5. Kitai T., Kawashima M., Fujii H. et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence monitoring of perineal wound contamination in abdominoperineal resection: a preliminary report // Surg. Today. – 2011. – № 41(8). – P. 1037-40. doi.org/10.1007/s00595-010-4417-7
6. Jung S.H., Kim J.H. Comparative study of postoperative complications in patients with and without an obstruction who had left-sided colorectal cancer and underwent a single-stage operation after mechanical bowel preparation // Ann Coloproctol. – 2014. – № 30 (6). – P. 251-8. doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.6.251
7. Mohov E.M. K probleme soedinenija tkanej v hirurgii organov brjushnoj polosti. Verhnevolzhskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2011; (4): 81-87. (In Russ.)
8. Lucevich O. E., Tamrazova O. B., Shikunova A. Yu. i dr. Sovremennyj vzgljad na patofiziologiju i lechenie gnojnyh ran. Surgery. 2011; (5): 72-77. (In Russ.)
9. Goldstein E.J., Citron D.M., Merriam C.V., Abramson M.A. Infection after elective colorectal surgery: bacteriological analysis of failures in a randomized trial of cefotetan vs. ertapenem prophylaxis. Surg. Infect (Larchmt). – 2009. – № 10 (2). – P. 111-8. doi.org/10.1089/sur.2007.096
10. Hagihara M., Suwa M., Ito Y. et al. Preventing surgical-site infections after colorectal surgery // J. Infect. Chemother. – 2012. – № 18 (1).- P. 83-9. doi.org/10.1007/s10156-011-0298-y
11. Andreev I. D. Atlas operativnoj hirurgii dlja veterinarov. M.: GJeOTAR-Media. 2009; 224. (In Russ.)
12. Betshart-Volfensberger R., Stekolnikov A., Nechayev A. Veterinarnaja anesteziologija. M.: Special litas. 2010; 272. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
SСHERBA S.N., DIMOVA E.A., BENSMAN V.M., SAVCHENKO Yu.P. THE COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THE STRUCTURE OF SCARRING TISSUE OF THE SURGICAL WOUND CLOSED WITH THE PROLONGED FLOW ASPIRATION DRAINAGE OF SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2017;(3):128-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2017-24-3-128-131
Views:
389
Email this article 